Everyone Who Disagrees with Mainstream Media is the Alt. Right

15

img_2294Editor’s note: Today, the hundreds of readers of The Age were treated to a sloppily patched-together article on “alt- right” media in Australia. It follows a slightly boring pattern of mainstream media sites desperately trying to catch up, after being repeatedly dakked over the results of Brexit and the Australian and US elections. Passing reference was made to The XYZ, in which a lazy editor forgot to highlight our full title when creating a hyperlink. Ironically, given that one of the key critiques of alternative or tabloid media (or fake news, as per the new terminology) is that people read just the headline or the short summary, and get a misleading idea regarding the actual story, the Age chose merely to mention a few XYZ headlines. If they had bothered to dig a little deeper, they could have discovered such gems as “The moment I stopped caring about racism” or “It’s all true: XYZ is run by Jews.” We’ll leave the rest to Eh?nonymous:

Well, it seems that XYZ has arrived. We are apparently insignificant and ‘fake news’, yet inexplicably still warrant a mention in The Age.

As you can imagine, the contradictory nature of this article has us giggling like schoolgirls, in much the same way that Milo did when Hillary completely discredited herself by devoting important pre-electoral press conference time to talking about some of his more outlandish headlines, and reading them aloud to millions, much to the delight and empowerment of every troll that ever shared a Pepe meme.

The Age is apparently so lacking in self-awareness that they don’t see any irony whatsoever in devoting half a page to a story about how insignificant and unimportant something is. If XYZ is, say… silliness, insignificance, and ‘fake news’, why would it warrant a mention at all? Why wouldn’t it be treated in the same manner as someone who had just contacted you to report a bunyip sighting?

img_1462The Age article reads much like their early Brexit and Trump articles. Full of ridicule, derision, and a smug (wildly inaccurate) clairvoyance. And we all know how that ended up. If past trends are anything to go by, the Age may well be writing about their future competition, in ridiculing XYZ and the other alternate media sites that they profile in the article (that I and many others will be checking out… thanks Age).

At the end of the day, this article reads like a bloated, talentless, pre-fab mainstream musician scoffing at the ability of someone who can play four instruments and has the ability to write their own music, simply because they aren’t professional. XYZ more closely predicted and reported upon the Zeitgeist surrounding Brexit and the U.S. election than the Age ever did, right up until the eleventh hour.

Unlike mainstream media, our reporting had little to do with our preferred outcome or wishful thinking on our part. Unlike mainstream media, we listened to those who commented on our pieces. They were on the ground, and probably had an even better handle on what was happening than we did. We did not slander them as being ‘deplorable’ or ‘alt-right’ when they disagreed with us. We pondered what they had to say, and grew as one of the few truly independent voices in Australian journalism.

And that’s it in a nutshell. This article by the Age is a slowly boiling frog. When a media outlet is content to give a derogatory blanket description to any of their readers (and they have a lot, just check out their comments) as ‘Alt-right’ for simply questioning the validity of something in the article they’ve just read, that’s the only evidence you’ll ever need that these mainstream media have a vested interest in manipulating public opinion and quashing dissent.

These people are supposed to be on our side, holding the people who affect our lives to account. Somewhere along the way, they became political power brokers, lucrative P.R. firms. They were proven irrelevant by falling asleep at the wheel of several major news stories. And they have the audacity to moralise over those of us who do this for little or no money. In closing from all of us at XYZ, I’d like to thank the Age for all the extra traffic…

SHARE
Previous articleFood for thought – Fidel Castro carks it
Next articleFood for thought – The commies who cried lone wolf
Eh?nonymous was a thoroughly repellent unemployed social justice warrior until a one in a million glitch in his Facebook account affected the algorithms in his news feed, omitting posts from his much loved left leaning Huffington Post and I F---ing Love Science, and inexplicably replacing them with centrist and conservative newsfeed items that slowly dragged him kicking and screaming into the light beyond the safe space that Mr. Zuckerberg had so carefully constructed for him. It’s a long road to recovery, but every Mark Steyn share he sees in his newsfeed is like another day clean from social justice addiction.
  • warty2

    I am an outraged Age reader. I’m afraid I’ve become so fixated by your silliness I felt compelled to read your article through to the end. I was so overwhelmed by the level of silliness, I’ve dropped all my sibilants on the floor below my computer. They are hissing aggressively at my silly feet. But I digress (indeed, I am so filled with identity politics, grievance BS, gender fluidity that I am quite often thoroughly addled). So, if I can get this out of my system before I proceed: You don’t frighten us, XYZ pig dogs. Go and boil your bottoms, you sons of a silly person. I blow my nose at you. Ah! I feel better now.

    Now, where was I? Oh yes. Getting Brexit wrong, and thinking dear Hillary would win. Now it is not the fault of The Age, nor the Sydney Morning Herald, nor the New York Times (that bastion of decent Democratism. Is there such a word?) nor the upright Washington Post nor the lovely leftish Huffington Post: the oafish Trump supporters simply didn’t listen to us. We tried our damnedest to tell them how to think, but they forgot to read our posts. I mean, talk about being irresponsible. Who’d be so stupid as not to read The Age, or the New York Times? Aren’t we all left wing?
    Warty

    • Steve B

      Ha ha – great post warty2…

    • Karen Dwyer

      “I’ve dropped all my sibilants on the floor below my computer. They are hissing aggressively at my silly feet. ”

      Lovely.

  • Gravedigger

    Age?…Age? What is this Age you speak of?

    • Irredeemable Deplorable

      The Age of a QueeryArse

      • Addelad

        Hair Hair old chap!

        • Irredeemable Deplorable

          False, false, false, correct.

  • Trog

    Congratulations guys you have “arrived”(if you didn’t know already).

    Imho, anyone who takes the remotest notice of the Age needs our support. They clearly have real difficulties and we should try to bolster them by using uncomplicated language, a welcoming body posture and by saying “oh dear” and “there, there” quite a lot.
    For those of us blessed with an adequacy of rational, sentient thought processes it’s simply wrong not to include those that struggle.

  • Steve B

    ‘Tis the poetry they come for methinks.

    An anonymous Poet…

    • Trog

      Too plurry right!!!!!

  • BJ

    Congratulations! All that remains is to be smeared on Media Watch and you will have truly made it; and I think, with a little sustained effort, you can get there. I can tell you from personal experience, it is immense fun when the 7.30 Report delegate some inexperienced twit to ring you unannounced to execute ambush gotcha journalism, and get to put them wll and truly in their place; although it won’t stop them defaming you.

  • Johann

    XYZ not on this list yet…egads !
    http://www.propornot.com/p/the-list.html?m=1

    • Karen Dwyer

      I couldn’t work out whether the linked site was satirical or not. Are they really, really clever at satire, or just a bit mad?

      [And I’m sure the same could be said of XYZ, :-))))))]

      • Johann

        Hi Karen,
        I think the site was serious !
        But they have already been taken to task for not explaining how/what exactly is the methodology used to compile their lists. Probably funded by Soros !

        It is ironic, as I consider that site to be a fake news site about so called fake news sites. Crazy times !

        • Karen Dwyer

          Crazy times indeed!
          It was the evasive “methodology” that made me think it was satire. Either way, an interesting reading list.