Australians can’t have a say on immigration because Holocaust

36

Ray Green

Some people might think that the people of a nation have the right to a say on who can immigrate to their country. Those people are Nazis.

This is the message the political establishment and the mainstream media are pushing in a suspiciously concerted fashion following Fraser Anning’s beautiful, breakthrough maiden speech on Tuesday.

Surely anyone with a triple-digit IQ is smart enough to see this for the clumsy propaganda it is (while anyone south of such a figure will presumably be too mystified to follow so tortured a narrative). In fact, it’s a promising sign that these out-of-touch oligarchs have nothing more convincing than bizarre historical allusions and Anne Aly’s tears up their collective sleeve.

“P-p-please don’t send me back, I like it here in your horrible, racist country!”

The ABC:

“Last night, Senator Fraser Anning used his first speech to Parliament to argue that all Muslims should be banned from migrating to Australia.

He said there should be a national vote to decide who can enter Australia, calling this the “final solution”.

In other words, he was appealing to the quaint notion that the will of the people should be the final arbiter in a democracy.

“Senator Anning says he won’t be apologising for using that phrase — “If people want to take it of context, that is entirely up to them,” he said — but his use of language most commonly associated with the Nazis has been condemned by both the Coalition and Labor.

Here’s how the term came to prominence and why it’s so controversial.

It’s first significant use was in July 1941, roughly two years into World War II.

Andrew Bonnell, Associate Professor in History at the University of Queensland, says that’s when Hitler’s lieutenant Hermann Goering wrote to another high-ranking Nazi, Heinrich Himmler’s deputy Reinhard Heydrich, and commissioned him with carrying out what the Nazis called “the final solution of the Jewish question”.

“That was in a sense the commencement of what we today refer to most commonly as the Holocaust,” Dr Bonnell explained.

The following January, the notorious Wannsee Conference was convened by the leaders of Nazi and German state agencies.

There, they discussed how to implement the final solution and coordinate their efforts towards the mass deportation of Jews to extermination camps and killing fields.

It’s estimated that 6 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust.

No, it is legislated that 6 million were killed, and anyone who doubts it in public has their life destroyed.

Be that as it may, the Senator was obviously alluding to no such thing (unless, of course, he was cleverly goading the left into spazzing out as spectacularly and predictably as they have done—in short, unless the old larrikin was trolling them…).

But if this was intentional bait, and they took it — more fool them!

The Holocaust has nothing to do with Australia, and Australian nationalism has nothing to do with Nazism. The people currently posting photos of exhibits from Holo-shrines all over the world are trying to foist their own ghoulish preoccupations on the Australian public. They will convince no one who hasn’t already taken sides in the struggle for our nation’s future.

Just look at the patent absurdity of this narrative. Once upon a time in the Bad Old Days, Hitler decided to kill all the Jews FOR NO REASON except that he was evil. Therefore, Australia must accept infinite non-white immigration forever.

It’s not only intellectually but also morally shameful, the way these pearl-clutchers are carrying on. I don’t have a problem with respecting the Jewish dead of 80 years ago, but what the institutional(isable) left is doing here is tantamount to grave-robbing: digging up corpses for profit — or to take one lurid detail of the Holocaust narrative, ripping out the teeth of dead Jews and melting down the fillings into what these ghouls hope will prove solid-gold political capital.

Of course, as long as they insist on bringing it up, there actually is a sense in which the Holocaust is relevant to the themes of Fraser Anning’s speech.

What the Holocaust, or indeed any other story of ethnically-based persecution, shows is that ethnic minorities live a precarious existence when surrounded by aggrieved majorities.

Now, the same people clutching their pearls right now are the ones who never shut up about “white privilege” and how nothing must get in the way of the plan to fill all formerly white countries up with masses of racially incited non-whites, who are told that our countries and our future belong to them as some kind of recompense for historical wrongs.

If we don’t listen to Senator Anning, we’ll soon wish we had.

  • Ron Mortimer

    I stopped believing in the holocaust when I learned that the Auschwitz death toll was officially reduced from 4 million to 1 million….and with no reduction in the 6 million total jews killed. There were supposed to be another 5 million non jews killed in the holocaust but it was admitted last year in a JTA(jewish telegraphic agency) article that that was a made up number by Simon Wiesenthal as he feared that the goyim wouldn’t give two shits about the holocaust without some racial skin in the game.
    The shrunken heads, lampshades and soap stories were debunked by Deborah Lipshadt(jewish professor of holocaust studies). Raoul Hilberg (jewish holocaust historian puts the Auschwitz dead at 400-500 000, less than half that of the new official total.
    They still throw people in gaol in Europe for questioning the story, a pretty good indication of the story’s inherent bullshittiness.

    So, as it stands, because we only see reductions and retreats in the official story is there anyone out there that still believes it?

    • 9x19parabellum

      But Muh 6 gorrilian

    • Maryanne

      Me too, Ron. The six million figure is just a cabalistic Jewish magic number and bullshit into the bargain. The Jews were bleating on about the holocaust of six million Jews required to re-establish their homeland well before WW2:

      1. “Jewish war sufferers in central and Eastern Europe, where six million face horrifying conditions of famine, disease and death…” – New York Times, 7th May 1920, p. 11.

      2. Regarding the “Greater New York Appeal for Jewish War Sufferers”: Hunger, cold rags, desolation, disease, death – six million human beings without food, shelter, clothes or medical treatment … New York Times, 7nd May 1920, p. E1.

      3. According to Felix Warburg, chairman of the Joint Distribution Committee of American Friends for Jewish War Sufferers, World War I “reduced to tragically unbeliavable poverty, starvation and disease about 6,000,000 souls, or half the Jewish population of the earth.” – NYT, 12the November 1919.

      • Ron Mortimer

        The holohoax is an very instructive study in the power of propaganda to create a false reality. Tens of millions of people believe the story so deeply they become triggered to the point of rage if anyone even mildly challenges it.
        Makes one wonder about how many other of our deeply held beliefs have been created the same way…
        For me waking up to the scam(and I was a true believer 25 years ago) was the Auschwitz reduction by 3 million yet the 6 mil total never changed. That did it for me. Only much later did I learn that 6mil was a kabbalistic magic number.

        A broader question then arose for me…what was WW2 all about? Strip it of the ‘holohoax’ and it was apparent that it was about money, empire, and the emerging NWO.

    • John Sheppard

      What happened to the Jews and other minorities under the Nazi regime was wrong. I think talking about the actual number killed is irrelevant because regardless, it is something that should never have happened, and should never happen again.

      As mentioned in this article, when you apply a label to an entire ethnic group in order to dehumanise them, or use them as scapegoats for all of the things wrong in the lives of others, then you are fanning the flames of a race war. If those being labeled are a minority then they are at risk of being persecuted.

      What frustrates me is this same journey is taking place in South Africa right now, and most people don’t even care, or worse, claim that nothing is happening.

      • Ron Mortimer

        Thanks for that considered reply,John.
        For me, the ‘what happened to the jews and other minorities was wrong’ rests on what exactly was done to the said jews and other minorities. As we have seen, the story we have been subjected to for 70 years is falling apart. All I want is the truth. After being lied to for so long i believe none of it, the same response any rational person would have.
        OK, I realise that after a war that involved 65 million dead some emotionally satisfying narrative must be promulgated by the winners before people start questioning WTF just happened and why, and atrocity stories are as good as any for that purpose.

  • Daniel Watts

    How many from the West died defending the the Jews from extermination? Admittedly, the US played both sides until Pearl Harbor some 2 years into it. Then those Russian commies swung the hammer and sickle from the east to finish off the war.

    Did just one Arab nation show up to protect them Jews from the Nazis?

    • Gary Slenders

      Quite the opposite. Adolf Hitler had met Haj Amin al-Husseini, the grand mufti of Jerusalem in which al-Husseini made clear he was quite prepared to help Hitler rid the world of Jews

      • Taipan

        Yeah because of Bolshevisim – its jewish

    • Ron Mortimer

      Interesting titbit…there were jews who wanted to fight for Germany. The Stern gang offered to fight for Germany as they saw the British as their enemy with its restrictions on the numbers emigrating to Palestine. This is also why as soon as WW2 finished the jews started attacking the British in Palestine, killing 700 or so British soldiers. There is a reason people say that the jews are the most ungrateful of people.

  • Taipan

    Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide:
    Article 2 of the Convention defines genocide as

    …any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

    (a) Killing members of the group;
    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

    Note part (c). This is exactly what’s happening to Australia.

    • Maryanne

      Exactly. All the white nations – apart from Russia, the Visegrad countries and increasingly Austria and Italy – are suffering genocide due to their filthy and traitorous leaders.

      Why? Why? Why? Why do our leaders hate us?

  • 9x19parabellum

    Annings final solution should have included the Jews. Bloody sick of them lying, guilting us, blaming us for the Holocaust (which may not have happened) swindling us, stealing from us, filling our government with affirmative action cry babies like aly, forcing diversity in us, forcing homosexuality and degeneracy on us, forcing high taxes and Marxism on us.
    I guarantee more white men died trying to rescue those ungrateful hooked nosed parasites from the Nazis.

  • Jamie Blank

    This is when one needs to snap back quickly about the Islamic genocide on the Indian subcontinent.

  • Jonathan

    It’s imperative next federal election every patriotic Queenslander puts Anning No.1 on their senate ballot paper.

    • Maryanne

      Yes. Please work to ensure this by supporting him in all your local newspapers.

    • Taipan

      Absolutely mate.
      Vote 1 Anning for the Senate!

  • Mattys Modern Life

    Spaz Turnbull and Bull Shorten shaking hands over a “non-discriminatory” immigration policy highlights exactly how out of touch our rulers are and the fact that the ALP and Coalition are exactly the same party.

    They are both multiculturalist Leftists hell bent on destroying this nation.

    Well done the Anning, there was plenty in the speech I disagreed with but the reaction of the sycophantic elite puts me square on his side.

    The mainstream media must be destoryed, as much the LibLabGreens!

    • 9x19parabellum

      All three major parties are in collusion and on the same side.

      • Mattys Modern Life

        Correct.

    • Taipan

      Which points you disagree with?

      • Mattys Modern Life

        He doesn’t want to cut the old age pension and still wants government to build infrastructure.

        I’m completely against any form of welfare, infrastructure I’m willing to discuss but welfare needs to go.

        I don’t want to be paying for some boomer who didn’t have kids so they expect everyone else to support them.

        • Ron Mortimer

          Matty, welfare is a payoff for one sector of society. There are other payoffs like a rigged real estate market that benefit other sectors. Excess regulation benefits yet another sector sector. Ethnic lobbies get treats. The banksters get a big drink too. There are many, many forms of welfare, and not all of the come from Centrelink.

          • Mattys Modern Life

            Correct, they all need to go.

          • Ron Mortimer

            Nothing short of complete economic collapse will pry the fingers of all beneficiaries from their goodies.Trouble is that in such a scenario all bets are off as to what may emerge from it.

        • gwallan

          Got shares in cat food have you.

    • Their handshake was evident of the contempt with which all politicians view the voting cattle.

      Democracy is the gun at our backs and the noose at our necks.

  • Dammit I wanted to write up Senator Anning’s maiden speech and now there’s nothing left to say. Smashing piece Ray. Hope you keep contributing.

  • Maryanne

    Ray Green, you hit the jackpot when you wrote, “it is legislated that 6 million were killed”.

    Yes, the government has actually legislated that we must believe what they believe.

    That’s not only creepy but appalling.

    • Ron Mortimer

      But at least by legislating it we know that it must be bullshit for them to do so. No one needs to legislate the truth.

  • Panadechi Santiago

    The Holocaust is a social construction for world Jewish dominance, serious revisionists have shown that there is much falsehood that six million Jews have died. Also in the war died 14 million Germans killed by the allies.

    • Ron Mortimer

      I think that there were another few million Germans killed after the war via mass expulsions(ignored, but when the germans did the same thing in a less bloody way it was wrong), as well as a million or two german soldiers killed after surrendering in the Rhine camps after Eisenhower refused to grant them POW status.

  • Such contortions are over the heads of many.

    We should not have a government policy to make the founding stock of this nation a minority.

    Multiculturalism is a government policy to make the founding stock of this nation a minority.

    Mass immigration is a government policy to make the founding stock of this nation a minority.

    South Africa has state enforced Multiculturalism and its founding stock are now a minority.

    Becoming a minority means death and poverty for your grandchildren.

  • John Sheppard

    Great piece Ray, and I was curious about the quote at the start, being:

    “Some people might think that the people of a nation have the right to a say on who can immigrate to their country. Those people are Nazis.”

    Is that you paraphrasing, or is that actually a direct quote from an article on the subject? I am hoping it is you paraphrasing…but I wouldn’t be surprised if someone actually wrote it!

  • James

    Cry bullies and their crocodile tears.