We don’t need no help from women

14

My colleague in the culture wars economist Steve Kates sent me the following link to a petition in the form of a letter to the Times which is to be sent on Monday the 8th of July. Titled, ‘The non-feminist declaration‘, it is a public declaration in opposition to feminism.

“In many countries, virtually all institutions have been deeply corrupted by feminists, and by people in positions of power bowing to feminist influence. These include governments, public sectors, media, family courts, education systems, academia, police forces, criminal justice systems, health services, military forces, and business sectors.

“Feminists have been responsible for, or have exacerbated, many of the problems facing humanity today. They include disparities in the treatment, opportunities, choices, respect, protections and rights afforded to citizens.”

It all sounds nice and positive, and a step in the right direction. But it is not. It is simply more of the same and will make absolutely no difference to the current status quo. In order to understand why, one only needs to examine who is behind this campaign.

Elizabeth Hobson
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS
JUSTICE FOR MEN & BOYS
(and the women who love them)

That right there is the problem in a nutshell. You still don’t get it? Okay, let me spell it out for you.

We got ourselves into this mess a hundred years ago when we began the process of removing the social restraints on women that had existed since time immemorial and that had served as a check on female hypergamy. Men acted to remove those restraints, not women. Of course women agitated for their lessening, but it was men who ultimately had to make that fateful decision.

Modern feminism is not an aberration of female behavior; it is a feature. Feminism is a reflection of the state of modern women. An extreme one to be sure, but what was extreme feminism 30 years ago is now considered to be acceptable social mores for the modern woman. Feminism merely reflects and casts a light upon where women will be in the next generation. The feminist behavior that we observe now and from which any sane individual rightly recoils will be the status quo in a couple of decades, if not sooner.

In general, women are not able to impose constraints upon their own behavior. Women rationalize their behavior in order to justify it. This rationalization process is the key to understanding the current mess in which we find ourselves. Remember, men are rational in their behavior while women rationalize their behavior. This is the fundamental difference between men and women and the core evidence for why matriarchal societies are always dysfunctional.

Men ceded power to women and women as a result are out of control. Women have no boundaries, and as a result they are miserable. The behavior that we see from modern feminists and women in general is merely an attempt to find their boundaries. But because we opened Pandora’s Box it is not possible to restore order to the situation while women still have a say in how things will be run.

Thus we have the situation of a woman, one Elizabeth Hobson, being the “Director of Communications Justice for men and boys”. The whole thing is completely absurd.

Modern men in general are weak and risk adverse. They are unwilling to stand up to feminism as their excuse is that since women see men as the enemy then their involvement in combating feminism will only make things worse. Far better to have women denounce feminism as coming from women it will be seen to have more potency. Have some women at the forefront and then the men can safely line up behind them in a good semblance of order.

But this merely repeats the same mistakes of the past and thus perpetuates the problem, in effect kicking the can down the road. The only way to combat feminism is to remove the cause; remember, feminism is merely a symptom of the wider problem. The malady is that women no longer have any constraints upon their own behavior. They have been told for years that they “can have it all”, surely the most solipsistic ideology to ever exist in the Western World. Women, encouraged by society in general, aspire to replace men and then wonder why they can’t find any decent men any more.

The only effective strategy to combat feminism is the most unpalatable one; systematically roll back women’s rights, get them out of the workplace, get them out of positions of power, and get them back in the home where they belong. Until that happens we will continue to see the obscene degradations of modern feminism. If we stay on the same course there is no endgame. Soliphisty knows no restraints. We are caught between a rock and a hard place but we put ourselves there and we only have ourselves and our modern ancestors to blame.

In order for that letter to which I linked to be truly accurate, simply replace every instance that the word feminism appears with the word female.

“In many countries, virtually all institutions have been deeply corrupted by females, and by people in positions of power bowing to female influence. These include governments, public sectors, media, family courts, education systems, academia, police forces, criminal justice systems, health services, military forces, and business sectors.”

Get the picture? It ain’t pretty, is it? Hard truths and realities is what you’ll find here. Don’t shoot the messenger. This letter to the Times is an absurd proposition. But then again, we sure do live in absurd times.

It was men who bequeathed onto women the curse of power. Only men can take it back from them.

This article was originally published at https://pushingrubberdownhill.com/, where Adam Piggott publishes regularly and brilliantly. You can purchase Adam’s books here.

  • Jael

    “The only effective strategy to combat feminism is the most unpalatable one; systematically roll back women’s rights, get them out of the workplace, get them out of positions of power, and get them back in the home where they belong.”

    How far should we roll back women’s rights? Was there a point in history where we had it just right, and if so, when?

  • Bronson

    I like the pithy turn of phrase which Adam often produced, as in this post. It is interesting how the feminine has taken control from the inside out whereby the beachhead was established in public sector agencies (government employment offering a ready made bureaucracy and security) by the masculine ceding control of the personnel function to women. Nowadays in the Commonwealth sector half of the Departments of State have women as CEO and most all agencies are a harem not just in terms of biology but in function. They have just one client, The Minister, and the role of the entire agency focussed on making the occupant look good and smell sweet. Other so-called ‘clients’ (e.g of Centrelink or Border) are basically business transactions.

    As to the effects of hypergamy in this environment there was evidence reported (although the signifigence was not seen) just a few days ago of one outcome

  • entropy

    Dear Adam,

    Thank you for your application for certification as an edgelord.

    We recognise your recent edgy article in which, rather that attack one of the many feminist hypocrites who infest our society, you criticise female egalitarians who object to the same ideology based on nothing more than their sex. We applaud such misogyny.

    We also acknowledge your attack on Jordan Peterson to the exclusion of the leftist authoritarians he is fighting, in an edgy if narcissistic play for attention and celebrity.

    However, as your are a massive wanker, we cannot accept your application.

    Yours faithfully,

    President
    Edgelord Association of Australia

  • 9x19parabellum
  • Jamie Blank

    Roll back women’s rights. In the west this may only occur under two circumstances:

    1) Feminists and their cuckold male counterparts are encouraged to masturbate themselves out of the gene pool by the use of contraceptives and/or porn.

    2) Supplantation with a new male dominant culture; most notably Islam.

  • killer3000ad

    Adam, what you are recommending sure sounds a lot like what the Taliban, Saudi Arabians and other backward cultures do to their women. You sure you want to go down that road?

  • Mattys Modern Life

    This was wonderfully edgy.

  • Maryanne

    Women aren’t the only problem, Adam. Too many young men have also been brainwashed into feminist ideology and agree women should have careers and outsource childcare. I’ve heard that some young men are resentful if their wives would like to stay at home. The cultural rot is deep.

    Just today I heard on the ABC Country Hour the Minister for Agriculture faffing on about how he was working towards gender equity on various agricultural boards. He parroted the feminist line that until there’s equal representation the boards are missing out on 50% of the talent – among other such idiocies.

    • That’s sad with the young men, but there’s a few things at play other than their feminist inspired attitudes (and their mothers would have been responsible for much of that finding purchase in their impressionable brains). Economic reality, the state of the house/housewifery/wifely/motherly duties and the expectation that a career wife is easier to get a better divorce deal out of than a housewife would all be relevant.

  • Maryanne

    Food for thought: men are rescuing those Thai boys. Well-trained strong men with brave hearts are risking their own lives.

    There’s men’s work and there’s women’s work and thousands of years ago even Aesop knew it, but our dumbed-down and degraded culture thinks otherwise.

    What bugs me about leftists is their irrationality and their inability to think. They just emote. On the one hand they claim that gender is just a social construct and on the other hand they demand equal representation of the sexes – not the self-chosen ‘genders’ – in all areas of social life.

    What the hell does that mean? Do they believe there are two sexes – male and female – or not? If they don’t they deranged.

  • Jai_Normosone

    I’m still not sure what to think of this article – whether it be very dark satire or someone writing-while-angry.
    At this point, I’ll just go “Meh….” and put it down to someone else having an opinion that is not the same as my own.
    As I read this, I am thinking of a good friend who is an author and a feminist (in the sense of seeking equality, not domination) and is especially feminine and a great looker as well. I just cannot see how winding back anything will help when there will be a proportion of the population who will be affected.
    Then there are the brainless twats in the feminist population who do themselves no favours (ie: Virginia Trioli of the A,B-Friggin-C) who stated this morning that if it was one of her children that was in the cave (Thailand) and she wasn’t told which ones had been pulled out and taken to hospital, she’d be kicking in the doors to get in to find out. How wonderfully brainless! She thinks that her right to know exceeds everything of all others – and doesn’t realise just how much fun it would be for someone to punch her in the mouth should she try to kick open those doors (whereupon she would fall down and cry and play the weak-female card….).