Fake News Watch: Lauren Southern did not apply for the wrong visa


I would like to state from the outset that yesterday we missed the perfect opportunity regarding our story Australia’s Disgrace: Lauren Southern declined visa, to run the headline “Based Peter Dutton BTFO’s TradTHOT Lauren Southern”. The moment has passed, so let’s press on.

If you think that was a weird opening paragraph, its purpose will become apparent later in this piece.

In yesterday’s article, I noted that Marxist extremist group CARF had been promoting the fake news line that Lauren Southern “may have applied for the wrong visa” in response to her Electronic Travel Authority Visa (ETA) being denied.

However it was not just the Australia-haters at CARF who were running this line. Some XYZ readers and conservatives in Facebook forums had either assumed, or were under the false impression from news clippings and radio reports, that Lauren Southern had simply applied for the wrong visa, similar to a blunder made by Australia’s fattest Muslim Yassmin Abdel-Magied who was denied entry to America several months ago.

This is not correct. As reported yesterday in news.com:

“Ms Southern had applied for an Australian ETA, or electronic travel authority. “The Australian High Commission have advised that you are not eligible for this service,” the website said. “You may wish to consider applying for a Visitor Visa (Subclass 600) with the Australian government”…

According to the Home Affairs website, an Australian ETA is for “short-term stays for tourism or business visitor activities such as attending a conference, making business inquiries, or for contractual negotiations” and is “not a work visa”.

A Visitor Visa (Subclass 600), which costs between $140 and $1045, entitles the recipient to visit Australia “for business purposes” for up to 12 months. Axiomatic Media is charging $79 for a basic ticket and up to $749 for an “intimate dinner” with the pair.

Mr Izaak told news.com.au the pair had applied for Temporary Activity Visas (Subclass 408) — which would permit them to work and normally take 10 days to process — “months ago” but had been “stonewalled and stonewalled with no response”.

“One-and-a-half weeks ago they asked for a criminal record check. Neither of them have criminal records, they got those clean, and still no response,” he said.

“Her immigration lawyer advised them to get a temporary ETA so she and Stefan can at least be getting the lay of the land, having a look at Sydney Harbour Bridge, [go to] Cairns for a crocodile safari, to immerse themselves in the country before they speak about it, and hope the government comes through with the [408 visa].”

But Mr Izaak said even the ETA was denied.”

So, both Southern and Molyneux have applied for the correct visa – a Temporary Activity Visa (Subclass 408) with plenty of time in advance, but have been delayed either by bureaucratic bungling or bureaucratic malfeasance (but I repeat myself). As Lauren Southern is to arrive early, she applied, on the advice of a lawyer, for a tourist visa – ETA – to cover her until her TAV came through.

To ensure we had the correct facts, we double checked with Axiomatic Events’ Luke Izaac, who has stated to The XYZ:

“It’s been over 2 months since the 408 working visa was applied for by both Stefan and Lauren. As the political stonewalling continued and we were asked to provide countless other pieces of documentation, we sought further legal council. Just under a fortnight ago (aware that Lauren was scheduled to land on the 9th) our immigration lawyer applied for a short stay ETA visa so Lauren could acclimatise to Australia while awaiting her clearance to work. Unlike the ‘instant’ nature of ETA’s, hers was deferred and 12 hours later declined…So to be absolutely clear: Lauren & Stefan have had a 408 visa application lodged for eons. The ETA was just a way to get her in for a week and a half to experience the country as a tourist, while hoping to be cleared on her 408.”

These are indeed the facts.

Unfortunately, a headline in the Australian, while not directly misleading, could have given some people the wrong impression:

Given that many people get their news from headlines, this matters. At The XYZ we pride ourselves on headlines which tell the entire story of the article, “Senator slut-shames slut” and “Hot Asian chick employed by ABC who has seen a lot of penises hates white men” being two of our favourites.

Many people also get a lot of their news from the opening paragraphs, which is why this opening paragraph could again easily give the wrong impression:

“A controversial alt-right Canadian journalist and YouTube star whose visa was “rejected” ahead of an Australian speaking tour had applied for the wrong visa, immigration officials say, and is now waiting on approval for the correct visa.”

Leaving aside debate over whether Southern is actually alt-right, Southern is not “now” waiting on approval for the correct visa – she had already applied for the correct visa. One can definitely make the case that the “immigration officials” have not stated the facts clearly, and the placing of this at the top of the article, accompanied by the headline, can easily give people the wrong impression that Southern did in fact apply for the wrong visa.

The Australian did report the facts, corroborating the statements by Luke Izaac, further down the article:

“Dave Pellowe, director of Axiomatic Events, which hosts conservative speakers, said Ms Southern applied for the 408 “temporary activity” visa many weeks ago and had planned to come to Australia early as a tourist, hence the ETA visa.

“The advised turnaround for a 408 visa is 10 days,” he said. “Our immigration lawyer advised us it is run-of-the-mill for someone visiting Australia to travel under an ETA while they wait for the 408.

“This has been going on weeks and weeks and weeks. She’s had to cancel international flights. It’s highly suspicious.”

Hence why the choice of headline qualifies the Australian’s article as fake news. The fact we have had to publish a follow up article reinforcing these facts demonstrates this. The XYZ’s headline “Australia’s Disgrace: Lauren Southern declined visa” was far more accurate. Lauren Southern applied months ago for the correct visa to enter Australia on a speaking tour, and her application for a tourist visa, forced on her by the unreasonable delay, was indeed declined. It is highly suspicious that Southern’s and Molyneux’s visas have not been cleared, and the delay is a disgrace, especially given that we take in over 200,000 people every year into this country.

Lauren Southern has produced a documentary, Farmlands, on the plight of white South African farmers, which will be screened at the speaking events with or without her. Australia’s Immigration Minister Peter Dutton made international headlines earlier this year when he stated that white South African farmers should be allowed to come to Australia, a civilised country, for their own protection. Now is the time for Peter Dutton to back up these words to further the cause o African farmers, and expedite the entry visas for Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux.

Over to you, Minister.

  • Repeal fake marriage

    So who do we voice our disgust to?

    • Jai_Normosone

      There are many that we can voice our disgust to. What we need is finding the element within the government that will listen and act upon it.
      What we have now is nothing more than lip service and politispeak when querying a member of parliament about an issue. What is mind-blowingly exasperating is the level of ineptitude and lack of knowledge of the people in elected office who consider themselves to be educated and wise (“You must refer to me as: ‘Honourable'”).

    • entropy

      The guy who’s helping you light your molotov cocktail.

    • Ariane

      Contact the Chinese Embassy.
      They will then contact their puppets, Malcolm and Dutton.

    • The minister.

  • Ralphy

    Detail, detail, detail. Luvviitt. Well done!

  • Bronson

    The ETA was not a wrong visa. Anyone having a passport from one of the eligible countries can apply, and the software would have found her to be listed on the MAL so returned a message to the person entering her details to contact the embassy.

    The question to Dutton is why was she put on that list, for that was a decision made by a person. The UK, Canada, Australia and NZ plus NZ all cooperate letting each other know of people they have knocked back so Lauren could well have been added as a result of the UK putting her on their list. Another reason, other than just blind copying the UK, would have been to ensure any ETA application by Lauren would be knocked back to ensure she applied for a manually issued visa to cover her likely activities when in Australia. Also having applied for the 408 and them dragging their feet on that they would have added her to the list anyway. If she’d been issued an ETA and turned up then the chances are high that when she actually arrived at the border she would have been denied entry because the immigration officer would have had a reasonable cause to believe that it was likely she might actually seek to engage in the activities she had in mind when she applied for the ETA, and thus breach the conditions of the ETA.

    More likely though is that the processing was put on hold to avoid making a decision and on MAL funneled her into this dead end. This is what a decent immigration lawyer would have helped with because it is illegal to avoid processing a legal application for any visa. Being on MAL stops an ETA but is not sufficient to stop all visas but does point to an approach to stall her long enough to make her application irrelevant. They should have known that there was a very high probability she was on MAL and would be rejected for an ETA, and should have been actively following up with Dutton’s office right from the start.

    • Bronson

      A couple of other possibilities lie behind Lauren being on MAL: Recall that ‘Red’ Dan Andrews invoiced Milo’s promoters for $50K to fund the effort to keep a lid Antifa’s violence which, last I heard, they would not pay. So could be that the cops asked her to be put on MAL. Another one is that Dutton was hauled over the coals by the socialists and media as being a racist bigot for floating the idea of offering refuge to South African farmers. The Border people would be anxious to ensure he did not attract further flames by being seen to have doubled down on this step by allowing Lauren to come and speak. Overall remember that the immigration agency is pro-muslim evidenced by one of their former Deputy Secretaries (Secretary being the government term for CEO) who was a Muslim being in charge of the relevant policy making areas. So when Tony Abbott conceded to allow an extra 12,000 places for refugees from Syrian he added that the intent was to help persecuted Christians but a Deputy Secretary was briefly interviewed on TV and asked about this he emphasised that the policy was non-discriminatory and of course the first arrivals were Muslims. The ETA was not right or wrong but the lawyers advice was wrong as was spreading the news in this manner. Government is terribly risk adverse and hates to be seen to have made a mistake so it is now more likely than before that her 408 application will be rejected rather than approved. Axiomatic will then have to take the decision to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, stacked with socialist supporters of refugees when it comes to Immigration decisions. The immigration agency’s main job is to make Dutton look good and smell sweet in the mainstream media so a behind the scenes approach would have been a better approach (although still likely to have been unsuccessful).

  • entropy

    Her visa is now approved.

    Funny how fast public officials can act when their bias and bigotry suddenly gets broad media attention.

  • Bronson

    Well a favourable outcome from a high risk approach transpired. Perhaps Dutton is not totally captured by the deep state after all. One can only hope.