Why Feminists love Islam



Islamists believe that any woman who shows so much as a wrist or a collarbone in public is practically begging for it. Also, if a woman says she was raped, then she deserves to die for having extramarital sex unless she can provide documented proof of the lack of consent, and this proof must be signed either by the rapist or four of his buddies.

Feminists want to legislate affirmative consent. Affirmative consent basically means that all sexual activity between a man and a woman is rape if the woman says it is rape, unless the man can provide notarized legal documentation proving that the woman consented to the specific sex acts the woman alleges were performed, and also that the woman enjoyed it. Also, your marriage certificate doesn’t count.

Feminists are ok with Islam. One of the defining characteristics of highly feminist nations such as Sweden, Canada, Germany, and to a somewhat lesser extent Australia, is subsidised mass migration from third world Muslim hell holes. Under feminist justice systems, these Muslims can get away with child rape almost as easily as women can get away with attempted murder of a man.

Respectable people (the sort that get hired by the ABC) don’t see any inherent institutional incompatibility between Islam and feminism (even when it is rubbed in their faces), but perhaps you aren’t one of those people. Perhaps you wonder why it is that in the face of radical Islam, feminist mantras like ‘teach men they are rapists’ somehow turn into ‘don’t wear revealing clothing because it might cause “misunderstandings”’.

It all makes sense when you realize the patriarchy is synonymous with western civilization and everything it stands for.

The presumption of innocence is the patriarchy. The right to bear arms is the patriarchy, and women who say otherwise are victims of the NRA, which is also the patriarchy. Economic liberty and property rights (ie., Capitalism) is the patriarchy. Science is a patriarchal construct which exists to promulgate another patriarchal construct called knowledge. Marriage (but not gay marriage) is the patriarchy. Free speech is the patriarchy if women feminists don’t like the content of it. Most importantly, the church is the patriarchy.

Islamists want to destroy the west and everything it stands for. Feminists want to smash the patriarchy. They are allies because they work towards the same goal. Just as jihadists are literally willing to detonate themselves to accomplish their goal, so also feminists are also prepared to become consumable sex objects if it will further their goals of destroying the west and getting that movie deal with Harvey. So brothers, please: when you see feminists begging for a manly man to come and save them from gang rape at the hands of jihadis, which they will, because they have no self respect: don’t risk yourself for them. Your life is worth more than that.

They asked for this. They voted for this. They chose not to recognize the real rape culture for what it was and imported it, while at the same time hyperventilating in response to imagined western rape culture. They virtue-shamed and deplatformed those of us who aren’t child rape apologists.

Tell them ‘my body my choice’. Save yourself for the women that didn’t hate you in peace time and didn’t vote for this insanity.

Photo by cordelia_persen

  • SamSammy

    It is true on one level that the Feminist-Muslim alliance is about common political interests, but on a deeper level it is about Feminists’ unfulfilled subconscious desire to be utterly dominated by an aggressive man who won’t take any of her bullshit. At the end of the day the Feminist loathes the “independence” and “empowerment” she screeches about, and desires nothing more than to be taken care of in every way including by having severe boundaries set on her behaviour. But she knows White men are too cowed for this, so she supports the mass importation of dark Muslim men as both a substitute and as a way to further cuck White men and thereby elevate her perceived SMV relative to White men. All Feminism ends in a burqa.

    • Micaiah

      I’ve come across that idea a number of times before and was thinking about it while drafting this article. I think the explanation of common political interests in combination with the Christian position that evil is inherently irrational works well enough so that it is not necessary to invoke that argument.
      Furthermore, I don’t think that argument works because the loudest voices for open borders are rich elitist people who usually live in large houses with large walls, and in many cases have private security as well. You rarely see women who live with rapefugees loudly and enthusiastically campaigning for open borders.

      I don’t think feminism would end in a burqa in a world without Islam, I don’t think Islam is in any way a direct product of feminism, even though feminism does directly enable and facilitate it. Without Islam, feminism would end in societal collapse caused by a collapse in birthrate and sexual morality, but it would take longer and it would look very different.

      • SamSammy

        I don’t see how you can say that evil is inherently irrational unless you’re prepared to describe all dualistic thought as inherently irrational. I would even go so far as to say that there is no such thing as true irrationality, just rationality with incomplete information.

        While it is certainly true that Islam and Feminism have common political interests, their incompatibilities are of such significance that they both constitute existential threats to each other. It takes more than an appeal to “irrational evil” to explain how they can overcome these incompatibilities, particularly given what we know about the evolution of the female mind.

        The loudest voices supporting open borders are not just the rich elite. How often have we seen pictures of White women holding up “refugees welcome” signs and handing flowers to them, and how often have we heard about women volunteering at refugee centres and getting beaten/raped/killed when they willingly went to “hang out” and “party” with refugee men? Middle-to-upper class women may support it more vocally than their working class sisters who get to see their neighborhoods transformed into no-go zones, but it is this very circumstantial distance from the consequences of their pro-open border views that allows middle-to-upper class women to indulge in their delusion (as well as a bit of sex tourism without even having to get on a plane).

        We can talk about what would happen in a world without Islam, but we don’t live in such a world. Moreover, the nature of the human psyche seems to be such that, if Islam did not exist, an ideology very much like it would eventually but inevitably arise and become a major cultural force in the world. When you remember that Feminism originally arose as a reaction against a patriarchal culture (the Christian West), it’s not hard to imagine that a societal collapse brought about by feminism in a world without Islam would lead to either a resurgence of the patriarchal culture it initially arose as a reaction to, or to the emergence of a new Islam-like patriarchal ideology.

  • belt fed 7.62mm

    As a colourful TV clown once said “Islam is the most feminist religion”

  • Scratch a feminist and you will find a misandrous Lesbian underneath.

    I have zero sympathy for cucked nations like Sweden, Canada and Germany.
    They have willingly opened the floodgates to the hordes of goat loving rapefugees from the Middle East.

    Now they reap what they have sown: their women and children are enriched and raped with impunity by the Muslims. The authorities and police turn a blind eye.

    Maybe we can ask China to kindly construct a special Island in the South China Sea as they construct their new military bases from the submerged reefs.
    The Island can be called Lesbos 2 and all the Feminists in the world can emigrate there and live happily ever after with no men to “spoil” things.

    Let’s see how that works out for them.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/762f0f2d0b8d41ce6b10ae6e668a8d198bc9b2c1377bcc145208a196eef7ef80.png https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c396ced6b2d465395c43ba9f7782261b145622a71b6f4f9d88d249a0a1e1d173.jpg

    • Micaiah

      Why make an Island for them? What’s wrong with deporting them to Antarctica?

      Seriously though, there is a benefit to letting them reap what they have sown besides schadenfreude, and that is that there is nothing like gang rape at the hands of jihadists to cure a feminist. Islam is much more effective than putting them on their own island. Feminism is cancer, Islam is chemo.

      • Well said. Bring on the chemo to cure them !

  • Caitlin1488
  • belt fed 7.62mm
  • treeman

    All “isms” are deranged lunatic religions based on a corrupt set of godless values developed by the Frankfurt School in Germany. You know Germany where just about every degenerate philosophy emerged. Under the umbrella of humanism all lives matter unless you are a European heterosexual male.

  • treeman

    Feminists are embittered, ugly fat slags in the general society. Those over preened elitists like actors and politicians professing to be feminists are just riding a popular curve until it peters out. Then they board another train to remain relevant. In the USA less than 8% of women identify as feminists. They are just a vocal minority getting their 15 minutes of fame. Normally they are just irrelevant ugly slags.