Why are so many leftists paedophiles?


Originally published October 4, 2017.

One of the things these days that’ll make you a racist and a sexist and an (insert)-ophobe is noticing patterns. Once you start, you’re done. You’re a thoughtcriminal forever.

And it’s getting impossible to deny the link between leftist beliefs and paedophilia. Now of course, most leftists aren’t paedophiles. But it’s becoming clearer that more paedophiles are leftists than not. Why is that?

Let’s find out.

Australia’s own far left, ‘anti-fascist’ (i.e. ‘communist’) brigade has its own links with paedophilia. That’s as good a place as any to start.

Primary school Assistant Principal Alex Gollan, prominent ‘anti-bogan’ crusader who was given a large platform to attack nationalists by the MSM, was convicted of paedophilia and the possession of child porn in 2015. He was a prominent member of the seedy far left who like to ‘bash the fash’ by shrieking ‘Nazi!’ at everyone to the right of Trotsky. Usually on your tax dollars.

Gollan liked to chat online with one of his nine-year-old students and call her ‘cutie’, ‘beautiful’ and ‘ms naked’. He claims that’s just how he talks to people.

His defence for the child porn? Nazis did it. Seriously.

alex gollan paedophile
Hitler made me do it.

He appears sincerely shocked by how badly received paedophilia is by the Australian public. As if he didn’t realise. I almost believe him. In the circles he moved, there are many people who are sympathetic to if not outright supportive of paedophilia. Don’t take my word for it though.

The far left media have been pushing sympathy for paedophilia for years. CNN, the New York Times, Salon, Psychology Today, VICE, Forbes, Jezebel, Eureka Street, the Atlantic, Salon again, Jewish Press and the Toronto Star have all run pieces expressing sympathy for paedophilia or arguing it should be considered simply another ‘sexual orientation’.

It’s clear that there are many in the postmodern left who, if not paedophiles themselves, at least consider that we treat it too harshly. For those of us outside the postmodern left, that’s called a ‘slippery slope’.

It also shows how we could reach a point at which people consider it perfectly normal for a four-year-old girl to crawl around a naked man at an ‘art’ installation.

Or how the establishment media could suppress the explosive story of Pakistani Muslim men in Rotherham grooming, sexually exploiting and passing around 1400 underage British girls over a period of 16 years while police turned a blind eye. Apparently the coppers didn’t want to be considered ‘racist’.

Or ‘bogans’ even.

In the US this week, Anthony Weiner pled guilty for texting his weiner to a teenage girl. This wasn’t the first time Weiner’s weiner got him in trouble. His son-to-be-ex-wife Huma Abedin, who was Hillary’s intimate, then deputy chief of staff, then scapegoat in that order during the election campaign, had already forgiven previous transgressions by little Weiner’s weiner. The ones we know about, anyway.

huma abedin not with her
That latte is extra salty. Courtesy of news media.

Huma also worked at a pro-sharia radical Islamist journal for 13 years, has family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and shady links with the House of Saud.

But remember: Trump said ‘pussy’.

leftists pdos photo
Weaponised thottery.

Of course, there was also the John Podesta email leak which contained enough evidence to warrant an official investigation. Instead, Podesta got a gig writing at billionaire Jeff Bezos’ blog, the Washington Post.

The connections in the US elite between leftism and paedophilia go far beyond Crooked Hillary’s little swamp, though.

Far left troll Lena Dunham not only admitted to sexually abusing her little baby sister when she was also a child, but described it quite graphically in her autobiography. She was shocked when normal people were shocked about it. She really didn’t understand that it was horrifying to any normal, decent person.

It’s not surprising then that she overcame her hatred of white men to praise Hugh Heffner upon his death for ‘celebrating sexuality’. I guess transgressives stick together. It was Heffner who gave Brooke Shields one of her early career breaks. She appeared naked in his publication Sugar n Spice in 1975, with the permission of Brookes’ mother Teri.

She was 10 years old.

Brooke Shields aged 10
Brooke Shields in Hugh Heffner’s ‘Sugar n Spice’ magazine, 1975. Original uncensored.Photo from flickr.

In 1983, a US Court ruled that the photographs did not breach child pornography laws. No-one went to jail. Totally normal.

Rumours have been rife for years about elite Hollywood paedophile rings. Despite growing evidence, there have been no charges. The same self-righteous Hollywood elite who protected Roman Polanski after he drugged and raped a 13-year-old girl continue to pretend there is nothing wrong with the culture in Hollywood.

Lest we think it’s just leftists in Hollywood and Washington, however, prominent figures in the 1960’s New Left movement were avowed paedophiles. Allen Ginsberg, still taught to English Literature undergraduates in universities across the West, was a life-long member of and advocate for the North American Man/Boy Love Association.

The deviants of the New Left avant-garde, all of them sexual predators, creeps or gluttons, operated in a libertine culture created by such paedophile-enablers as Alfred Kinsey, Wilhelm Reich and Sigmund Freud.

The same pattern of leftist elite paedophilia holds in the UK.

Only in the last few years have rumours regarding the extent of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), a pro-paedophile group which operated from 1974 to 1984 among Britain’s elite, been confirmed. PIE had links to people who became establishment politicians and senior bureaucrats in the UK. Although defended by a communist academic in 2014 on far left blog The Conversation, elite members of PIE committed paedophilia on ‘an industrial scale’. PIE was even given money by government of the day. Now to be fair this occurred in the context of 70’s Britain, during which time the Prime Minister Ted Heath was a savage paedophile and some of the most famous entertainers included Gary Glitter, Jimmy Saville and honorary Brit Rolf Harris. All got away with being paedos for years.

The ideology of PIE was very much a part of the wider sexual liberation in swinging London, which was firmly a movement of the left.

As we saw with Alex Gollan, connections between the far left and sexual deviancy are too clear to be ignored. The New York professor and member of Antifa who tweeted about proudly teaching ‘future dead cops’, Michael Isaacson, was into sado-masochism, bondage and group sex. That’s at least according to his Fetlife profile.

The Antifa organisers of the Berkeley riots in 2016 and 2017 also have ties to NAMBLA.

There is much more evidence than what has been covered here, but suffice it to say the far left in particular has a problem with paedophilia. This brings us back to our original question: Why?

In my view, it is because the left is always obsessed with transgression against traditional morality. Modern leftism is the spirit of rebellion; the mindset of one who, feeling wronged by the world, will take revenge upon it by destroying its moral foundations. The left is a cult of moral inversion.

Whether it is the destruction of property rights, the corruption of marriage, the erasure of identity or transgression against sexual propriety, the left are into chaos. It has been so throughout history, but especially since the French Revolution.

It is no surprise that Western Marxism in particular gives rise to inclinations like paedophilia. Western Marxism, after all, is focused upon the destruction of culture and the family. It is why Western societies are in such deep, deep trouble.

Saul Alinsky is another luminary, so to speak, of the New Left period in America. He was a community organiser in Chicago, and mentored men who later groomed a young Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama in how to rouse a rabble against evil whitey. He wrote a book, ‘Rules for Radicals’, which should be required reading for anyone fighting the left today. He dedicated it to ‘the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer’.

When you see what paedophilia is you realise that it doesn’t matter if you believe in the devil or not. Rather we must pretend that he exists regardless, and fight him.

  • Leftist = mental illness.
    Paedophile = mental illness.
    American Liberal = mental illness.
    Homosexual = mental illness.
    Transgender = mental illness.
    SJW / Anitifa maggots = mental illness. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6624fcdc2a652ea837ae1e79b3fa44b4246b1ca870cf4db9c7b3956f1636dfa5.jpg

    Should all be under lock & key in a Sanitorium,for all eternity. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/41ab50078f06977b55166c19f016ab84efdeab2f5b228857d6ec3b757f8a5bb0.png https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c10c1d5021d032a5417a716548b2d98ee334e2ff6af4d9433f292403e6a5831b.png

    • Bikinis not Burkas

      Islam = mental illness, at least that is what the MSM and Governments would have you believe, but we know better don’t we!

  • chucky

    That filthy, vile, Lena Dunham cunt may have been only a child when she started sexually abusing her sibling, but she kept doing it for many years into adulthood.

    Not only that, she also managed to turn her sister Grace Dunham into a child sexual abuse apologist!!!

  • Concern4Future

    Death, destruction and mental illness defines the left

    • SamSammy

      It is fitting then that the word “sinister” is derived from the Latin word for “left”.

  • James

    Some never grow out of wanting to play dress ups.

  • Bikinis not Burkas

    This makes for interesting reading, careful who is standing next to you at the bus stop, supermarket etc, you just never know who!

  • SamSammy

    Re believing in the devil: supposing Satan did exist and wanted to devise a belief system to lead humanity astray and ultimately bring about Hell on Earth, I can imagine that belief system would look very much like Socialism.
    Not only does Socialism deny and ridicule the idea of Divinity, it also plays the Devil’s greatest trick of convincing people that he too doesn’t exist. It promises a paradise of Earthly material abundance, but only after a large-scale blood sacrifice of those Evil Capitalists. It tempts people with sweet lies of equality, fairness and prosperity but gives them oppression, poverty and mass slaughter. It leads people to think that moral superiority is found in the embrace of mental illness, sexual perversion, theft (“wealth redistribution”), and the violent suppression of free speech and free thought. It embraces brutalist and degenerate forms of “art” which cause the human spirit to wither in despair because they are devoid of beauty and harmony. And, of course, it identifies itself with the colour red.

  • The greatest trick that Satan ever played was convincing the world that he wasn’t real.

  • Wal Ford

    Because Leftists have a self-indulgent juvenile mentality. As moral relativists and
    Secular Humanists, they replace the Almighty with themselves as the
    creator of reality and the arbiter of what is good or evil — and evil
    is defined as anything that would stand in the way of their righteous

    When you do not accept an objective
    standard of truth and morality, when you do not see yourself invested in
    those around you in the here and now, nor in the world you leave
    behind, all there is left is you as the entire universe.

    what if how they get their rocks off victimizes others and/or selects
    our society for extinction [as we build more coffins than cradles]? To
    hell with tomorrow, and to hell with everybody else.

    • BunyipBill

      While I agree with your sentiments, I do not see why we need to have a belief in a deity to form “…..an objective standard of truth and morality,…..”. By following your line of reasoning we run into the ‘my god is the (one) true god business and whose book contains the “truth”. Both the bible nd koran contain passages that any [dare I say it] morally upright people find utterly repugnant.

      Remember that in the absence of evidence, ALL religions are equally invalid and can lay no claim to any moral superiority regardless of how fervently its adherants argue it to be so.
      Having read and rejected most of the major religious texts,I am quite content with my moral standards and the “entire universe”.

      • Wal Ford

        Being a secularist or religious can be objective or subjective. It is the latter that is key. If one is subjectivist [“our own mental activity is the only unquestionable fact of our experience”] and religious, a person can claim that their perception of Deity and their religion is the only valid one. A subjectivist secularist would say that their political ideology is solely valid.

        An important aspect of subjectivism is that logic, reason and evidence are considered to be forms of superstition. That is why when you confront a committed Islamic fundamentalist or Marxist with evidence and logic, they become batshit hysterical.

        The mere existence of opposing thought is a dire threat and is therefore treated as such. That is why subjectivist secularists and religious people consider themselves duty-bound to use propaganda, indoctrination, demagoguery and censorship in order to advance/protect their unreasoning dogmatic Cause.

        The close cousin of subjectivism is moral relativism [what’s virtuous and real to you, might not be for me]. The combinations of these is essentially sociopathic. With no common, objective values or basis for morality, all there is left is that it is not what is done, but who is doing it and to whom. Truth is replaced by individual or group identity — and a willingness to use force to impose your will upon others.

        As an illustration, consider the difference between scientific dialog and lawyerly debate. Scientists are trying to find truth. If a colleague or even a rival proves, through logic, reason that your hypothesis is invalid or your theorem is faulty, you are grateful because everyone is on the same side.

        A lawyer’s milieu, by contrast, is about establishing dominance in a completely artificial kabuki dance. Lawyers are not trying to find truth; they don’t believe in truth. They are trying to win. So if logic, reason or evidence comes up that would make them lose in Court, an effective attorney will do everything they can to conceal that which undermines their case — and to over-emphasize anything that would support their position.

      • Ron Mortimer

        What you write makes perfect sense and may very well be true, but the question of whether any society can survive without a dominant religion is still open.
        I personally doubt that a society can function without a dominant religious ethos that is totally accepted by at least 30% of the population while the remainder pays varying degrees of lip service. Without that, nothing works, everything becomes a fight.

  • Sadsak

    What comes first? The chicken or the egg.

    • Steve Mangan

      The rooster – as usual !

  • Michelle Gaye Dyason

    What a load of extreme bullshit! And all you tossers believe, not one of you check his facts or I should say non existent facts. Thank fuck you’re in the minority!

    • La Trobe and Melbourne Uni….gender and diversity studies…say no more, all is explained.


    • Repeal fake marriage

      Directly over the target are we deary?

    • killer3000ad

      Me thinks the lady doth protest too much.

    • BunyipBill

      I wouldn’t expect anything less from a left-wing radical rainbow keyboard warrior.

  • LyovMyshkin

    I made the mistake of watching a new television show the other day called ‘Better Things’. It’s written by Louis CK and within the first five minutes there is a scene with four young children — I’d guess aged 8 but some of them looked younger — playing truth or dare. The first dare was one of the young girls asking another young girl to insert Monopoly parts into her privates.

    (One wonders how it’s even legal or where they can find a parent who would allow her child to participate in such a thing but I guess Hollywood is full of mothers willing to sacrifice their child’s innocence for the chance at fame.)

    The slow creep continues.

  • Roddy

    Wow, what a load of cherry picking bollocks. Pedophilia exists everywhere, not just in the so-called ‘left’. You have been utterly sucked in to the ‘divide and conquer’ doctrine, as perpetrated by the ruling-class elite. Such willful gullibility and stupidity, you are under control.
    Trump, been strongly accused of pedophilia, accusations only dropped when the complainant received death threats: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/04/donald-trump-teenage-rape-accusations-lawsuit-dropped
    Trump’s best mate, a convicted pedophile: http://nypost.com/2016/10/09/the-sex-slave-scandal-that-exposed-pedophile-billionaire-jeffrey-epstein/
    Australia’s conservative party, the LNP, funded by pedophiles: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/revealed-how-exclusive-brethren-members-secretly-donate-to-the-liberal-party-20160615-gpk0nd.html
    And should we get into the ultra-conservative Catholic church, choc-full of pedophile priests and consistently protected by conservative politicians. This is our version, George Pell, best mates with the likes of Tony Abbott and John Howard from the LNP: http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/2017/06/29/pell-shock-charges-send-shockwaves-around-the-world_a_23009246/
    Read this: https://thedailybanter.com/2017/06/suffer-the-children/
    I could go on. And on.
    This website obviously exists in a tiny echo chamber, a miniscule bubble of its own delusional filth.

    • entropy

      Cites The Guardian, NY Post, SMH, Huffington Post.

      Complains about echo chambers.

      If you gullible hypocrites had a brain cell to rub between you, you’d be dangerous.

    • Repeal fake marriage

      No, it’s just the left.

    • Jai_Normosone

      I had to down-vote this on the basis of “It’s everywhere” before slagging off at people who read this site.
      If you were a true progressive or held true conservative values, the facts would have been stated without resorting to insults. I know the response will be: “What about those who slagged off at me?”
      Simple… you started it and people responded. They wouldn’t have done it if you’d remained focused on the facts.

      My reasoning for this reply though is that you are correct… paedophiles and pederasts are in all walks of life and it is truly something I cannot fathom where people who want to put themselves forward as being good for society or “vote for me” or are in a position of power where they demand respect (ie. The Judiciary) – want to take the weakest members of society and treat them like they do which will thoroughly ruin the life of at least the young person and then it flows on to their family if the child turns up dead or remains missing forever.

      This cannot be a partisan thing because it really isn’t…. It is just an observational fact that those caught out tend to be more left-leaning than otherwise. This doesn’t make it right for anyone else to do it though.

      Entropy was correct though… your sources of “truth” need a LOT more credibility.

  • PaulMurrayCbr

    “But it’s becoming clearer that more paedophiles are leftists than not.”

    Well … apart from the religion industry, of course. Still the bulk of paedophiles and other deviants.

    • BunyipBill

      From my experience, a lot (most) of the religion industry, especially those in the ‘religion of pieces’ are of the leftist persuasion.

  • Ron Mortimer

    How sweet it was to read of the above assistant school principal who enjoyed doxxing others went down for pedophilia. I read the linked article where he complains that others were framing him….and while I don’t normally like to see others framed for anything, in his case I would make an exception. I visited his “anti bogan” site years ago on a know your enemy basis and his toxic self righteousness was just begging for a bit of karma.

  • Jai_Normosone

    There are so many points in this article that I say that I could not cover better than David has already done.

    The thing I find most amazing is that my mental picture of the “Antifa” types are college students and people who consider themselves to be members of the intelligentsia – yet they refer to themselves as “Anti-fascists” when the very foundation of fascism is of the left.