Originally published October 4, 2017.
One of the things these days that’ll make you a racist and a sexist and an (insert)-ophobe is noticing patterns. Once you start, you’re done. You’re a thoughtcriminal forever.
And it’s getting impossible to deny the link between leftist beliefs and paedophilia. Now of course, most leftists aren’t paedophiles. But it’s becoming clearer that more paedophiles are leftists than not. Why is that?
Let’s find out.
Australia’s own far left, ‘anti-fascist’ (i.e. ‘communist’) brigade has its own links with paedophilia. That’s as good a place as any to start.
Primary school Assistant Principal Alex Gollan, prominent ‘anti-bogan’ crusader who was given a large platform to attack nationalists by the MSM, was convicted of paedophilia and the possession of child porn in 2015. He was a prominent member of the seedy far left who like to ‘bash the fash’ by shrieking ‘Nazi!’ at everyone to the right of Trotsky. Usually on your tax dollars.
Gollan liked to chat online with one of his nine-year-old students and call her ‘cutie’, ‘beautiful’ and ‘ms naked’. He claims that’s just how he talks to people.
His defence for the child porn? Nazis did it. Seriously.
He appears sincerely shocked by how badly received paedophilia is by the Australian public. As if he didn’t realise. I almost believe him. In the circles he moved, there are many people who are sympathetic to if not outright supportive of paedophilia. Don’t take my word for it though.
The far left media have been pushing sympathy for paedophilia for years. CNN, the New York Times, Salon, Psychology Today, VICE, Forbes, Jezebel, Eureka Street, the Atlantic, Salon again, Jewish Press and the Toronto Star have all run pieces expressing sympathy for paedophilia or arguing it should be considered simply another ‘sexual orientation’.
It’s clear that there are many in the postmodern left who, if not paedophiles themselves, at least consider that we treat it too harshly. For those of us outside the postmodern left, that’s called a ‘slippery slope’.
It also shows how we could reach a point at which people consider it perfectly normal for a four-year-old girl to crawl around a naked man at an ‘art’ installation.
Or how the establishment media could suppress the explosive story of Pakistani Muslim men in Rotherham grooming, sexually exploiting and passing around 1400 underage British girls over a period of 16 years while police turned a blind eye. Apparently the coppers didn’t want to be considered ‘racist’.
Or ‘bogans’ even.
In the US this week, Anthony Weiner pled guilty for texting his weiner to a teenage girl. This wasn’t the first time Weiner’s weiner got him in trouble. His son-to-be-ex-wife Huma Abedin, who was Hillary’s intimate, then deputy chief of staff, then scapegoat in that order during the election campaign, had already forgiven previous transgressions by little Weiner’s weiner. The ones we know about, anyway.
Huma also worked at a pro-sharia radical Islamist journal for 13 years, has family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and shady links with the House of Saud.
But remember: Trump said ‘pussy’.
Of course, there was also the John Podesta email leak which contained enough evidence to warrant an official investigation. Instead, Podesta got a gig writing at billionaire Jeff Bezos’ blog, the Washington Post.
The connections in the US elite between leftism and paedophilia go far beyond Crooked Hillary’s little swamp, though.
Far left troll Lena Dunham not only admitted to sexually abusing her little baby sister when she was also a child, but described it quite graphically in her autobiography. She was shocked when normal people were shocked about it. She really didn’t understand that it was horrifying to any normal, decent person.
It’s not surprising then that she overcame her hatred of white men to praise Hugh Heffner upon his death for ‘celebrating sexuality’. I guess transgressives stick together. It was Heffner who gave Brooke Shields one of her early career breaks. She appeared naked in his publication Sugar n Spice in 1975, with the permission of Brookes’ mother Teri.
She was 10 years old.
In 1983, a US Court ruled that the photographs did not breach child pornography laws. No-one went to jail. Totally normal.
Rumours have been rife for years about elite Hollywood paedophile rings. Despite growing evidence, there have been no charges. The same self-righteous Hollywood elite who protected Roman Polanski after he drugged and raped a 13-year-old girl continue to pretend there is nothing wrong with the culture in Hollywood.
Lest we think it’s just leftists in Hollywood and Washington, however, prominent figures in the 1960’s New Left movement were avowed paedophiles. Allen Ginsberg, still taught to English Literature undergraduates in universities across the West, was a life-long member of and advocate for the North American Man/Boy Love Association.
The deviants of the New Left avant-garde, all of them sexual predators, creeps or gluttons, operated in a libertine culture created by such paedophile-enablers as Alfred Kinsey, Wilhelm Reich and Sigmund Freud.
The same pattern of leftist elite paedophilia holds in the UK.
Only in the last few years have rumours regarding the extent of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), a pro-paedophile group which operated from 1974 to 1984 among Britain’s elite, been confirmed. PIE had links to people who became establishment politicians and senior bureaucrats in the UK. Although defended by a communist academic in 2014 on far left blog The Conversation, elite members of PIE committed paedophilia on ‘an industrial scale’. PIE was even given money by government of the day. Now to be fair this occurred in the context of 70’s Britain, during which time the Prime Minister Ted Heath was a savage paedophile and some of the most famous entertainers included Gary Glitter, Jimmy Saville and honorary Brit Rolf Harris. All got away with being paedos for years.
The ideology of PIE was very much a part of the wider sexual liberation in swinging London, which was firmly a movement of the left.
As we saw with Alex Gollan, connections between the far left and sexual deviancy are too clear to be ignored. The New York professor and member of Antifa who tweeted about proudly teaching ‘future dead cops’, Michael Isaacson, was into sado-masochism, bondage and group sex. That’s at least according to his Fetlife profile.
The Antifa organisers of the Berkeley riots in 2016 and 2017 also have ties to NAMBLA.
There is much more evidence than what has been covered here, but suffice it to say the far left in particular has a problem with paedophilia. This brings us back to our original question: Why?
In my view, it is because the left is always obsessed with transgression against traditional morality. Modern leftism is the spirit of rebellion; the mindset of one who, feeling wronged by the world, will take revenge upon it by destroying its moral foundations. The left is a cult of moral inversion.
Whether it is the destruction of property rights, the corruption of marriage, the erasure of identity or transgression against sexual propriety, the left are into chaos. It has been so throughout history, but especially since the French Revolution.
It is no surprise that Western Marxism in particular gives rise to inclinations like paedophilia. Western Marxism, after all, is focused upon the destruction of culture and the family. It is why Western societies are in such deep, deep trouble.
Saul Alinsky is another luminary, so to speak, of the New Left period in America. He was a community organiser in Chicago, and mentored men who later groomed a young Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama in how to rouse a rabble against evil whitey. He wrote a book, ‘Rules for Radicals’, which should be required reading for anyone fighting the left today. He dedicated it to ‘the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer’.
When you see what paedophilia is you realise that it doesn’t matter if you believe in the devil or not. Rather we must pretend that he exists regardless, and fight him.