PATROLLED: Elderly ABC reporter shocked by dress standards for women


An elderly ABC reporter was astonished on Monday to discover that there are standards of dress for women in the Canberra press gallery. She quickly apologised, rushed home and tried to avoid making a spectacle of herself.

lol jks. Of course she didn’t. She made herself the centre of an entire news cycle.

Because, you know, privilege.

How dare the patriarchy destroy the rights of a strong, liberated womon in the current year? This would never happen to a man, amirite?

Actually it would, it just doesn’t. And the reason it doesn’t has nothing to do with male privilege and everything to do female privilege in the workplace.

As with everything else in the postmodern Australian workplace, there is a double standard when it comes to dress for women. Men are, on the whole, expected to wear the male uniform in a professional Western setting: pants, dress shoes & socks, belt and collared shirt, with a tie and maybe a jacket if it’s a high-status occupation. That’s the straitjacket expected of Australian men in professional settings.

Women, on the other hand, get away with pretty much whatever they want. They can wear short skirts, which are the female equivalent of shorts. They can probably get away with bloody shorts if they want. I’ve seen sandals, collarless shirts, open-necked blouses and even singlets hanging off women on six-figure salaries while the men around them are in a shirt and tie.

We are now daily subjected to the revolting image of pendulous breasts exposed like some Bronze Age fertility figurine in the most solemn chamber in the land.

Nobody should have to look at that, and while the women who dress like that in the workplace feign indifference, they wear it so you do look. If they can’t make you lust, they’re gonna make you suffer.

The Gen X womon Western Marxists are so soaked in female supremacism, though, they truly believe themselves to be oppressed. Displaying the classic doublethink and projection we always see from Marxists, they instead accuse men of oppressing them. It’s a neat trick, and it gives them power over others, so they’re doubling down on it. And the propaganda is getting intense.

Well what was she wearing to draw such attention to herself?

Maybe displaying your nipples had something to do with it, love? Men respond to signals. It’s biologically hardwired. If you don’t want to get catcalled, wear a bra.

And if you don’t want any sexual attention whatsoever, try this.

If you live in Sydney or Melbourne, you should probably get used to it anyway.

As well as being child abuse, this is entirely false. Women make study and work choices, and men make study and work choices. Men choose more lucrative and stressful occupations due to sexual competition with other males and pressure from women to provide. Women, instead, choose more fulfilling occupations. And if women only cost 70% of what men do for the same job, men would be unemployed and businesses would only be hiring women. Which isn’t happening. So it’s bullshit.

But who needs facts when you’ve got government propaganda funded by taxes largely taken from men?

Nice stunt, Yumi, but we all know the real problem is that the man sending you those messages wasn’t good-looking and high-status enough for you. You’re offended that a gronky old bastard thinks he can get away with it, and in your outrage you want to parade him in front of the country. If he looked like the guy on the right in the video below, you’d have sent him your number immediately.

One of the many myths of female supremacism in our society is that men are shallow and go for looks while women are deep and go for ‘confidence and personality’. More bullshit. It’s been shown repeatedly by redpill activists that women will respond enthusiastically to a man of good looks no matter what his personality is like. Women are just as looks-driven as men when it comes to assessing Sexual Market Value.

The problem for women though, locked as they are to biology, is that their Sexual Market Value plummets as they hit 30. They hit The Wall. This is a rude shock to Western women who really came to believe that they can have it all whenever they want, and they’ll still be an exciting sexpot at 40. It’s honestly quite sad to see so many women who wasted their youth have this shocking revelation.

Rather than adjust our cultural values and mores around sexual purity and propriety, however, women in public sector roles are doubling down. They are seeking to use the power of the state to destroy The Wall, to try and re-engineer society to make it the boundless provider of free stuff that they were told as little girls it would be. Having screwed their way well past Prince Charming, they want to use the media and government to make The Wall go away and regain their lost status as interesting young hotties with the world at their feet.

It won’t work, wimminz. Your future is red wine, cats and abortion regret.

And for many of you, it’s not your fault.

Although I am disgusted by what our women have become today, I ultimately don’t blame them. Men are the leaders of the family and of society, and if our women are foul and insane then the responsibility for that lies with us. It’s our fault.

Now, before you MGTOW types sperg out on me, I’m not making some sort of white knight argument here. I’m saying that this problem with our women goes back a long way, and if men in the West had not gone astray first then we would not be dealing with an epidemic of broken, shrieking harpies doing everything they can to destroy our civilisation. At some point, we failed to be the leaders and protectors they needed, and they then stopped being the nurturers and supporters we need.

Something happened to Western men, and through them to the Western family. It’s almost like some alien influence came into our culture, and motivated by a remorseless hatred for us and the faith which held our societies together, worked to destroy us. As if some group created movies which celebrated individualism and pleasure-seeking at the expense of family and long-term fulfillment, wrote books which sought to discredit the Christian family and the men who led them, taught university students to become cultural Bolsheviks, funded politicians who pushed policies which replaced the family with the welfare state and used the media to push values destructive of morality, decency and social order.

It’s too weird to think that all those things just happened by themselves. Surely someone, some group, must have been behind it…

Originally published at

  • Jai_Normosone

    Good article – but I can see that the latest sprog-machine who had the fuse lit on her tampon simply by thinking she wasn’t paid enough to make her own coffee this morning, will take this piece to be an attack on women. The fact that you showed that brainless cunt from the Greens will confirm this.

    Yes, I do mean it when I say that SHY is a brainless cunt. That is the nicest way I can describe her. She is very smart when it comes to shit from books but she has no smarts whatsoever when it comes to real life. She’s also far too old to be engaging in this childish shit that constitutes The Greens – but, like …. {dipshit who leads the party… so ineffectual that I cannot remember his name…} , they are holding onto immature and childish ideals that anyone who has been forced to become an adult had left behind years ago.

    “Nice stunt, Yumi, but we all know the real problem is that the man sending you those messages wasn’t good-looking and high-status enough for you. You’re offended that a gronky old bastard thinks he can get away with it, and in your outrage you want to parade him in front of the country. If he looked like the guy on the right in the video below, you’d have sent him your number immediately.”

    This is 100% on the money!
    Women will try the internet-dating thing when the “Diet Coke Delivery Guy” isn’t showing her enough attention (or everyone at her place of work and every pub in the area has already ridden that bike), will start a conversation with a bloke who sounds interesting and will then not respond once they see the picture. This is FACT because I proved it by doing it myself.
    I also qualify myself that, between my looks and personality, I am the greatest birth control to have ever been born – so I have neither ridden any of the bikes nor show praise or worship to the endless stream of fucktards who do.

    “One of the many myths of female supremacism in our society is that men are shallow and go for looks while women are deep and go for ‘confidence and personality’. More bullshit.”


    The greatest problem experienced by blokes who want to find a nice woman is that every single one of them is different. One woman is looking for the caring type; one is looking for the intellectual type; one is looking for the model; one is looking for the pretend tough guy because he has tattoos; and the rest seem to be looking for someone to perform the bukkake.
    So blokes end up settling on what they control and the bad advice of “Keep ’em keen, treat ’em mean”.

    The greatest problem experienced by un-jaded women is that they think that blokes haven’t had enough of their bullshit in trying to work out what it is the hell they want when 99.99% of women have double-standards and say one thing while doing another. They them succumb to the raffle of parting the knees where the bloke (whose surname they probably haven’t bothered to learn) will stay the next morning or will just leave her in the carpark where he found her.

    If these mongrel scraggs want respect from males (as very few seem to make it to be an actual ‘man’), then they need to get back to the practice of deserving it.

  • thegentlemantroll

    Ladies on tinder – which wouldn’t exist without the willing participation of women – trying to take the moral high ground in the gender wars. At least prostitutes operate in the framework of being a legitimate business, they can probably expect better protections.

  • What group is that David? I’m truly confused, confused, confused…

    Was that an echo?

    Hmm…I just can’t see it, guess I shoulda gone to spec-savers.

    • I’m trying to behave myself. Trying.

      • Name the spec-saver!

      • Bucky Redux

        Throw caution to the wind, it’s exhilarating.

    • Taipan

      Tony Abbott gave us a clue recently: “Rootless, cosmopolitan intellectuals parading their moral superiority, or masters of high finance dressing up self-interest as economic correctness”

    • entropy

      Mel Gibson… ibson… ibson…

      • Bucky Redux

        Mel is apparently a Templar Knight, make of that what you will.

        • Taipan

          His father turned 100 a few months back.

      • Nooooooooooo

    • fimbulwinter

      Surely it can’t be someone chosen by G-d right?

      • Bucky Redux

        “They” murdered J—s.

        • fimbulwinter

          Oy gevalt! He’s burning in hot semen

  • Jamie Blank

    1) women were always like this.
    2) traditionally they’d get a bun in the oven and reality would hit them.
    3) the contraceptive pill has changed this.

    Feminists are drug fucked crazies.

  • Bucky Redux

    All true, dear Author, all true.
    Womons have been weaponised to divide and destroy our Western families and society.
    The march of the Marxists/Fabians continues, almost unopposed.

    • fimbulwinter

      One day they will all pay! French riots are the beginning!

      • thegentlemantroll

        Put your head in a bucket of ice champ. Australia is the one country in the world that is not getting a right-wing Renaissance. The wall of blissful ignorance is too thick. It’s gay Venezuela for us.

        • fimbulwinter

          Wishful thinking mate, but sadly you are right. Shit will hit the fan with the housing collapse and all the normie attention will be stuck wondering who won master chef.

  • entropy

    What’s particularly telling is that female business owners, who don’t even run the risk of being metoo’d by their equal human being employees, are often the most vocal about not hiring women.

    There must be something about wanting to make money that makes people raging sexists. I mean, that’s the only possible explanation.

  • Ryan

    Too right David! I wonder who this (((alien))) out group influencing our society could be?

  • fimbulwinter

    Speaking of wall hitters I’m being eyed on the train by a hideous feminist lookalike of Rose whatamacallit from Ryan’s last post. Set manspread angle extra wide. Bitch.

  • Finbar Foley

    The majority of MGTOWs I know would agree with you. The nature of females needs to be bridled by men, otherwise it goes the way it is going now. In a sense we are the enablers.. I think that’s why the MGTOWs have taken themselves out of the game, because they can’t be bothered trying to rectify the situation.