The left are hate-fuelled fanatics


Observing the educated chattering class and certain voices in the mainstream media, one might assume that Australia has an issue surrounding extremism and the polarisation of political factions, as being seriously problematic and a hindrance to social cohesion. An honest closer examination will find that politically motivated violence and extremism is entirely a one way street.

Should one ever be confronted with the utterly nonsensical assertion that ‘the right are just as bad as the left’, there are some questions that should be asked immediately and in close succession. They are as follows:

When was the last time a Greens Senator had their office trashed for one of their leanings on public policy?

When was the last time a leftist politician was head-butted by a conservative?

How many elected left leaning public figures have been advised to cancel speaking events by Police due to the level of danger posed by Conservative protestors?

How many Conservative activists have opposed Leftist book launches by proclaiming: ”Let’s make this book launch a thoroughly unpleasant affair”?

Far-left thugs assualt ordinary Australians at a conservative book launch in February 2017. Screenshot from the Herald Sun.

When the last time a Conservative or patriotic group violently sought to shut down a leftist rally?

When was the last time Conservative protestors physically blocked leftists from getting on buses to attend a fundraiser headlined by elected representatives?

Name one occasion where Conservatives have set upon a leftist in the street and attempted to physically assault them?

To make matters worse, the mainstream left in the media seem to make light of their extremist storm troopers and brown shirts. Even John Oliver – though attempting a lame declaration of not condoning violence – found amusement from Tony Abbott’s run in with a violent anarchist from Tasmania.

When not being amused by political violence there seems to be a concerted effort to shape criticism against leftist aggression in sympathetic tones. A Sydney Morning Herald piece that was written shortly after Andrew Bolt was attacked by Antifa clowns in Lygon Street quoted Dr. Troy Whitford, a history and politics lecturer at Charles Sturt University. He stated:

“..political violence in Melbourne was “nothing new” but it had been a long time since violence from the far-left had been as prominent”.

The SMH article explained:

“Antifa takes its inspiration from the German Antifaschistische Aktion network that arose prior to World War II. Dr Whitford described the Australian version as a loosely-assembled “reactionary group” that seeks to combat the alternative-right, with a particular focus on defending multiculturalism, anti-racism and feminism.”

Personally I don’t recall a time where Unions have not protested through the streets led by convicted criminals, waving banners claiming that they are at war, but I do concede that a new violently intolerant desperation has become a distinctive feature of political activism on the left.

A grossly incorrect assertion however, is that Antifa and their ilk are seeking to counteract the influence of the ‘Alt-Right’ in Australia. This suggests that they are extremists against another form of extremism, which could not be further from the truth. Observing everything from online polls and petitions to State and Federal elections, it’s clear that many Australians favour tight borders and low taxes, while opposing mass immigration and expensive power bills that are based on Green-Marxist climate dogma.

The leftists in our streets aren’t opposed to fringe-dwelling white supremacists, because to them anyone who favours sensible border policies, sees the unmistakable violent nature of Islam, and views Western Civilisation in a positive light is a fringe-dwelling white supremacist. None of these positions are extreme unless of course you’re an extremist.

Yet to go further into the suggestion of left and right equally needing to claim ownership of their extremist behaviour, let us actually examine how much the right condones its more radical elements. When Milo Yiannopoulos came to Australia to do his talks, Andrew Bolt – hero of the right and victim of leftist thuggery – was appalled at Milo’s well-aimed, justified and hilarious jabs at controversy wench Clementine Ford, proudly displaying images of her with the proclamation ‘unfuckable’ attached.

Spot on. From YouTube.

Why so sensitive Bolt?

In the UK Tommy Robinson left the English Defence League – the group he founded – following their descent into extremism. Robinson himself stated:

“I acknowledge the dangers of far-right extremism and the ongoing need to counter Islamist ideology not with violence but with better, democratic ideas”.

It’s easy to find footage of Pegida in Germany physically removing neo-Nazi elements from their rallies or the Proud Boys vocally expelling white supremacists from their gatherings.

At every level the right know where to draw the line and they make a very serious point of drawing it. Jordan Peterson and Daisy Cousens have observed this phenomenon and have noted that it’s around the point where Western chauvinism turns to racial superiority that the line is drawn, and in many cases quite vigorously. No such line is drawn on the left; in fact it’s continuously obscured, justified or simply ignored.

Another common fault in the discussion about political extremism is the use of the term ‘far-right’. Even the term ‘right-wing’ implies a belief system that is on the fringe edges of what can be accepted in polite society. To reiterate the above statements, there is nothing extreme about wanting to maintain border integrity, nor is there anything unruly about making a rational correlation between Islamic doctrine and the violence carried out in its name. There is nothing loony about a healthy scepticism about climate alarmist canon. Wishing to not commit cultural/demographic suicide through mass migration is also reasonable and knowing that there are only to genders is just plain, bare, unflinchingly true to life fact. Not only are these positions perfectly sensible but the opposition to them is increasingly unhinged, which only serves to illustrate their practicality.

As more and more high profile personalities in politics, entertainment, media and business abandon the left, it really has become a place where only the extremist can remain. There are very few worthwhile, tenable positions to be held on the political left, as evidenced by the outrageous and childish attempts at authoritarian censorship of their political rivals. As the political conscience of a new generation awakens, it’s abundantly clear which side of the political spectrum has the answers their young minds seek, and which side comprises of the hate-fuelled fanatics who seek to forcefully impose their way on the world. The left have never quite realised how much they share in common with the Khmer Rouge while, the right show all the hallmarks of a new and exciting broad church of thought and practical solutions to the issues that plague our civilisation.

Fortunately for generation Z, their choice of political leanings is a relatively easy one. All we need to do is keep on keeping on.

Previous articleStan Grant takes on the Sport Gender Pay Gap
Next articleMurdoch Murdoch: Skydaddies Being and Time
Samuel Medici
Samuel studied International Relations and Middle Eastern Studies and is deeply interested in conflict and strategy. He first became interested in Geopolitics after listening to a rap group known as the Outlaws who's individual rappers are named after military dictators, a couple of whom have now been deposed. The ingenious, proportionate and moral application of aggression are a common theme in Samuel's writing, along with an eloquently sinister red pilling with the intent of decimating the Neo-Marxist status quo. One might say, a red pillaging. Samuel served in the Australian Army. He draws inspiration for his writing from the likes of Christopher Hitchens, Dinesh D'Souza, Steven Crowder, Eazy E, Tywin Lannister and Conan the Barbarian. His long term aspiration is to see leftist thought diagnosed as a character disorder and no longer serve as a political leaning. 
  • chucky

    As usual, the ignorant delusion of the left is only exceeded by their hypocrisy.

  • emkay

    The Left is a disease, lets hope there is a cure before too long..

  • James

    Taught to hate from very young. They’re victims really. Denied a useful education that would equip them to be productive and view things rationally.

    Will never forget reading a year nine school report for my eldest son and had to ask him what was this about. Can’t recall which class it was. With the new edubabble labels they use for the subjects now I have to ask which one’s which.
    The report that caught my attention stood out because it had nothing to do with what the subject was supposed to be. It read “If (name) wishes to express opinions he should be prepared to back them up with facts”.
    Asked my son what she was on about and he said she’d asked the class to write down why they thought the British were able to take over and colonise Australia so easily.
    My son wrote Because they had superior technology.
    From what he told me she made an issue of it in class.
    He said what he wrote was the fact.
    Apparently most of that year was spent showing them films and indoctrinating them about “Invasion” and how nasty the British were.
    Obviously my son was guilty of using his own mind. Made me proud.

    That was just one example I saw but no doubt they’re all being indoctrinated to view everything that is as bad instead of receiving a solid grounding in maths and a consistent version of english.
    Pandering to their emotions and giving in to their whims does them no good either. That’s why they throw tantrums to get their way now which is what we’re seeing in the news.

  • Shaking ordinary people out of the need to be saints (which leads to unthinking or vain virtue signalling by those with no skin in the game, and activism by others) and instead to simply be responsible forward thinking adults is the key.

    Almost everything that modernity provides is harmful to posterity.

    People used to understand that society was built on sacrifice and maintained by restraint. Now even our so called conservative politicians screw the pa and make money out of blabbing about it.

    We now have a hundred years of progressive political examples to review when deciding how we should go forward.

    Not one of those examples suggests that current fashions of materialism, statism, feminism, equality and multiculturalism are going to give us anything other than more concentrated misery.

    • James

      I suspect things are the way they are because those in prominent influential positions are raking in a fortune and want things to stay this way. Keeping the masses distracted and squabbling maintains the status quo.

      • As I have said before, every cabinet member since the last Menzies government should be shot and their descendants stripped of all material wealth.

  • Bronson

    Bolt often displays a two steps forward but then one backwards approach.

  • John Sheppard

    Yet the amount of people I know who have no problem with their behavior is amazing. That being said, they rarely see it first-hand, and get the censored version from the media which attempt to dehumanise the victims in order to justify the violence.

    As Stefan Molyneux keeps pointing out, that is a dangerous path to follow. Speaking of which, I take it the XYZ is aware of the issues Lauren and Stefan had with their Auckland gig?