Viewer Poll: Safe Schools

10

With the passing of fake marriage legislation in Australia, the left have moved swiftly to focus their efforts on cementing Marxist gender theory in the school curriculum. From the Conversation:

“The results of the same-sex marriage postal survey were clear: Australia voted in favour of equality. The marriage equality bill has passed, and the mandate to deliver inclusive sexuality education in schools is more pressing than ever. LGBTQI+-inclusive sexuality education should embrace diversity in the classroom, the staff-room and in whole-of-school policies.”

Today on The XYZ, Sam Vimes gave us a taste of what is to come by pointing to the trajectory that leftist identity politics has taken in Canada:

“To quote the Ontario Human Rights Code – “refusing to refer to a trans person by their chosen name and a personal pronoun that matches their gender identity… will likely be discrimination when it takes place in a social area covered by the Code.”

This video gives us a taste of what is to come, with education systems in some of the more suicidal European countries focusing on raising children in a gender-neutral environment:

Of course, the Safe Schools Program here in Australia has given us a taste of what is to come… right now. And what must be repeatedly shouted from the rooftops is that the program has been designed by people who have openly lobbied for the rights of pedophiles to have sex with children. From unsafeschools.org:

In October 2010 La Trobe University’s Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society (ARCSHS) launched an Australian “Safe Schools” program…

The longtime Deputy Director of ARCSHS is Prof. Gary Dowsett, and he has been Acting Director on two occasions, for a significant period of time. The first was in 2000, from January to August; and the second was in 2010, from July to December. Hence, the “Safe Schools” program (launched in October 2010) was launched during a period when Dowsett was Acting Director. [Source: ARCSHS Annual Report 2010]

In 1982, he authored an article for the journal ‘Gay Information‘ [issue no. 11, pp. 34-38], which was published by a Sydney-based organisation called ‘Gay Information Service’. The article was titled ‘Boiled Lollies and Bandaids: Gay Men and Kids‘ (click here to view the original). Here are some excerpts:

“First, we have three legal/social questions to win: custody rights for gay men and lesbians; the legal right of paedophiles and their young loves; and finally, the sexual rights of children as a whole.”

“And I also have a friend, a paedophile, who is working very hard on making sense out of his relations with boys. Those relations consist of, among other things, a large amount of nurture and support for these boys, a real caring for their welfare and growth.”

“How different then is that gentle, tentative sexuality between parent and child from the love of a paedophile and his/her lover? From all their accounts and from many academic studies (some worse than others), that kind of love, warmth, support and nurture is an important part of the paedophilic relationship.”

“The current paedophilia debate then is crucial to the political processes of the gay movement: paedophiles need our support, and we need to construct the child/adult sex issue on our terms.”

It is in light of this evidence, which despite being publicly available for quite some time has not prevented the program from being rolled out in Victoria, that we present the following poll, prepared by our friends at BarbariaPolitica:

Should the parents of innocent children exposed to the perversions of Safe Schools be able to publicly hang those responsible?

  • Can we bring our own rope? (41%, 236 Votes)
  • Yes (30%, 175 Votes)
  • Absolutely (17%, 99 Votes)
  • As long as there's a Royal Commission too, that's a yes from me. (12%, 69 Votes)

Total Voters: 579

Loading ... Loading ...

Photo by Rafael Sato